Sample Preview · titlescope

TitleScope — College Athletics Financial & Title IX Intelligence

The U.S. Department of Education publishes every college’s athletics finances and gender-participation numbers each year in the Equity in Athletics Data Analysis (EADA) bulk files — but only as raw, one-year-at-a-time spreadsheets. The free government cutting tool stops at those raw numbers, and the best-known free database (Knight-Newhouse) only covers D-I public schools. TitleScope assembles the part nobody sells: an all-institution (D-I/II/III, NAIA, NJCAA and more — public and private), multi-year, sport-by-sport panel keyed to the IPEDS UnitID, with the derived Title IX gender-equity metrics the raw files never assemble — the proportionality gap (the Prong-1 red flag), per-athlete economics, women/men parity ratios, and within-division percentiles.

Preview-only page. It shows the structure and capability of this dataset using a small, representative sample. The proportionality gap, the women-to-men spend ratio, the within-division expense percentile, and the per-record quality score — the derived, sellable columns — are withheld here, and the full panel is not downloadable from this page. It is provided separately after licensing.

Coverage & headline figures

Built from the U.S. Dept. of Education’s free, keyless EADA bulk endpoints, parsed into a clean SQLite panel and enriched with deterministic gender-equity formulas. No LLM, no API key, no login — rule-based and reproducible.

9,989
Institution-year records
the financial & Title IX panel
2,105
Distinct institutions
by IPEDS UnitID
85,915
Sport-year rows
the long, sport-by-sport panel
2021–2025
Survey years
academic 2020-21 … 2024-25
$8.7B
Athletic expense tracked
survey year 2024 alone
−13.3pp
Mean proportionality gap (2024)
women under-represented vs. enrollment

Association mix: NCAA 1,090 · NJCAA 468 · NAIA 240 · CCCAA 113 · USCAA 48 · NCCAA 40 · NWAC 32. Control: 1,193 public · 887 private nonprofit · 24 private for-profit. In 2024, 1,248 institutions field a women’s athlete share more than 10pp below their enrollment share, and 7,923 institution-years across the panel clear the >5pp Prong-1 red-flag threshold. 99.4% of institution-years pass the weighted quality bar (target: 80%+).

Source (free, keyless, public-domain federal data)

  • EADA data-file API (ope.ed.gov/athletics/api/dataFiles/…) → the survey-year catalog and the annual zip per year.
  • instLevel.xlsx → one record per institution — financial & Title IX rollups plus the embedded IPEDS-sourced context (enrollment by gender, control, division).
  • schools.xlsx → one record per sport per institution — the long, sport-by-sport panel.

What’s in it — schema

Four cross-linked tables, all keyed on the IPEDS unitid. institution_years is the headline deliverable — the all-institution, multi-year financial & Title IX panel; sport_year is the sport-level detail that rolls up into it.

Tables in the dataset
Table Grain (one row =) Notable columns Rows
institution_years one institution in one survey year exp_total, women_partic_share, participation_gap, spend_ratio_w_to_m 9,989
sport_year one sport at one institution-year partic_men/women, rev, exp, aid by gender 85,915
institutions one institution (IPEDS UnitID) institution_name, state, association, control 2,105
division_year one division tier in one year peer counts, expense distribution (percentile basis) benchmark

Columns in institution_years (the headline table)

unitid / year IPEDS UnitID + EADA survey year
institution_name / state Institution and location
association / division_tier NCAA / NAIA / NJCAA … + tier (I-FBS …)
control Public / private nonprofit / for-profit
enroll_men / enroll_women IPEDS enrollment by gender
partic_men / partic_women Athlete counts by gender
rev_total / exp_total Total athletic revenue & expense
women_partic_share Women’s share of athletes
participation_gap Women athlete share − enrollment share (Prong-1) — gated
spend_ratio_w_to_m Women’s vs. men’s expense per athlete — gated
exp_percentile_in_division Expense rank within peer tier — gated
exp_cagr Compound growth of athletic expense — gated
quality_score 0–1 completeness score — gated

Columns in sport_year (sport-level detail)

unitid / year Cross-link key to the institution panel
sport EADA sport name (Football, Basketball …)
partic_men / partic_women Participants by gender
rev_men / rev_women Revenue by gender for the sport
exp_men / exp_women Operating expense by gender
aid_men / aid_women Athletic aid by gender (parity basis) — gated

Sample preview gated

A representative slice of NCAA Division I-FBS programs for survey year 2024 — the kind of cross-school comparison the panel makes trivial. Institution, division, total athletic expense, and women’s-athlete counts are shown; the proportionality gap and the women-to-men spend ratio — the proprietary, sellable derived columns — are redacted. Eight of 9,989 institution-years; ordering is by expense and does not reflect the gap.

institution_years — 8 sample rows, survey year 2024 (proportionality gap & spend ratio withheld)
Institution State Division Athletic expense Women athletes Proportionality gap Spend ratio W:M
Ohio State University OH NCAA I-FBS $64.6M 540 −••.•pp •.••
University of Michigan MI NCAA I-FBS $55.2M 496 −••.•pp •.••
University of Notre Dame IN NCAA I-FBS $49.9M 392 −••.•pp •.••
The University of Alabama AL NCAA I-FBS $38.5M 410 −••.•pp •.••
University of Connecticut CT NCAA I-FBS $24.2M 371 −••.•pp •.••
Old Dominion University VA NCAA I-FBS $15.1M 218 −••.•pp •.••
University of Memphis TN NCAA I-FBS $13.2M 193 −••.•pp •.••
University of Louisiana at Monroe LA NCAA I-FBS $5.8M 177 −••.•pp •.••

Request the full live sample

Get a live, end-to-end sample of TitleScope — the all-institution institution_years panel with the proportionality gap, spend and aid parity ratios, and within-division percentiles, plus the full sport-by-sport detail, quality scores, and methodology.

Request the full live sample →

No full dataset is downloadable from this page. Public-domain U.S. Government data (Dept. of Education EADA); not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education.